Here is Benjamin Fulford’s June 27, 2019 interview with PrepareforChange.net:
Author: Benjamin Fulford
Dear Mr Fulford:
I would be grateful if you could comment on this article which appeared in the British Jewish Chronicle.
As a Jew and particularly with the rise of anti-semitism, I find it very upsetting and worrying to read anything that could stoke the flames even more. What if the article below is correct and this family are innocent of all the accusations?
First of all, the article you sent me was missing the first several words of every sentence. If you can get me a link or a full copy, I will post it on my home page for the benefit of my readers.
However, please understand that as a journalist, I try always to get my information from primary sources. If a representative of the Rothschild family would like to do a public interview with me, I’m sure many people will watch it and judge for themselves. Too often the Rothschild name is used as shorthand for a group of interrelated families who exert enormous control over the privately owned central banks.
Also, years of research have led me to the conclusion there is a subgroup of the Jews who are not actually Jewish, but worship Satan, Ba’al, Molech, etc. They appear in the Book of Ruth and carry out human sacrifices. They hide behind the Jews and use them like a matador’s cape to distract people from them.
Also, there is a group that I call the Sabbateans who believe that it is up to the Jews to make the biblical prophecies come true and bring on the Messiah. This group was behind the creation of Israel. Members of my Jewish family were among those who believed God would do God’s work and wanted to stay in their European homeland. They were attacked and forced by Hitler (a member of the Saxe/Gotha/Rothschild/Habsburg family complex) to go to Israel.
If you check the history, you will see that Jews were only allowed to flee to Israel in the face of Nazi persecution. Canada has recently apologized for closing its borders to Jews fleeing the Nazis.
Anyway, the rabbit hole runs deep, but I would be happy to set the record straight for the Rothschilds.
Dear Mr Fulford:
Thank you for replying so promptly.
I hope the attached link works as I am not the most technical of people. If not, you can find the article in the Jewish Chronicle. I did a search and it is dated December 11, 2017 under Robert Philpot’s name. It was reprinted on June 21.
I do hope that you manage to obtain an interview with a Rothschild family member, especially if all that is written about them is untrue. I hope that it is, but one does not know what to believe any more.
Should you publish this article, it will be very interesting to read the responses to it.
I wish you well in your work and in your life. Thank you.
The latest attempt by Khazarian Satanists to trigger World War III in Iran has backfired spectacularly. What happened was that U.S. President Donald Trump, following the orders of Satanic Chabad pseudo-Jews, ordered a massive attack on Iran on June 21st, a day of Satanic summer solstice fire sacrifice, but the U.S. military refused to obey him. In the end, the only fire sacrifice came in the form of huge explosions at a Philadelphia oil refinery that took place at the same time the Iran attack was supposed to have happened.
This came about as Iran shot down a U.S. drone entering its airspace, while deliberately not shooting down a manned U.S. airplane that accompanied it. To save face, Trump’s Khazarian puppet masters issued laughable news reports saying they had hit Iran with a “retaliatory digital strike.” What they should have said was a “retaliatory fake news strike.”
Iran has actually been very restrained, considering that oil storage facilities at its biggest container port were set ablaze on June 5th, while on June 7th, six Iranian merchant ships were set ablaze almost simultaneously in two Persian Gulf ports by “incendiary devices” of “unknown origin.”
Pentagon sources say Israel was the likely perpetrator of these attacks, and a direct line was established between U.S. Central Command and the Iranian Navy to ensure that third-party provocations like this would not result in war between the U.S. and Iran.
In a related move, U.S. Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan was fired “because he showed up on a list of people compromised by the Khazarian mafia,” MI6 sources say. In particular, he was deeply involved in the “weaponization of civilian aircraft by Boeing,” his long-time employer. In other words, he was involved in the Malaysia Air Flight 370/17 mass murder and nuclear blackmail incident, the sources say.
The U.S. military also remains unwilling to supply a Secretary of Defense to, or follow orders from, the Trump administration. Instead, “the military is sending its elder statesman, former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Mike Mullen, to oppose war with Iran on ABC,” Pentagon sources say.
Even long-time Trump supporters are finally beginning to realize the president is personally compromised and blackmailed by the Satanic Chabad cult to which his son-in-law Jared Kushner belongs. These fanatics believe they have to trigger a war between Iran, China, and Russia (Gog) and the G-7 (Magog) in order to start a war that will kill 90% of humanity and allow them to enslave the remainder.
Trump, meanwhile, bounces back and forth like a ping-pong ball, depending on whether the last person he talked to was a U.S. military patriot or a Khazarian Satanic gangster.
On North Korea, Trump is getting sane instructions from the U.S. military. That’s why North Korean Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un announced he had received a “letter of excellent content” from President Trump and that “he would seriously contemplate the interesting content.”
According to White Dragon Society sources in the White House, the letter proposed …
The meltdown of the Zionist control grid is now public, as even the corporate mainstream propaganda media is reporting the attacks last week on tankers near Oman as “false flag.” The situation has reached the point that former U.S. colonies like Germany and Japan are openly and publicly defying the U.S. President and Secretary of State on this issue. This surreal turn of events is comparable to the fall of Communism and the Soviet Union.
In this case, we are witnessing the fall of the U.S. corporate government and (possibly) the rebirth of the Republic of the United States of America. In fact, we may even be witnessing the fall from power of the secret family groupings hiding behind monotheism.
The 13 bloodlines who have controlled monotheism are, in fact, negotiating a new system for running the planet, according to European royals and members of the White Dragon Society (WDS). If these negotiations succeed, it will be the biggest event in thousands of years of human history. If they fail, there will be chaos and bloodshed, especially among the elite, anti-bloodline Gnostic Illuminati, sources say.
Even if this sounds exaggerated, events in the actual real world do show a fundamental change. Let’s start with the failure of the false flag attack of the coast of Oman. U.S. naval intelligence and CIA sources followed the money to see who benefits from this attack. The trail led to the Rothschild-owned Glencore commodities company in Switzerland, which had positioned itself to profit from a spike in oil futures prices immediately before this attack took place, the sources say. Unfortunately, the oil futures price spike turned out to be merely a dead cat bounce and the Rothschilds failed to profit as expected. That’s because the markets, and the world, have had enough of the Zionists crying Iranian wolf, they say.
What’s interesting about this latest provocation is how even a former U.S. colony like Japan is no longer going along with the Zionist playbook. To quote from corporate news reports, “Even if it’s the United States that makes the assertion, we cannot simply say we believe it,” said a source close to Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. If having expertise sophisticated enough to conduct the attack could be a reason to conclude that the attacker was Iran, “That would apply to the United States and Israel as well,” said a source at the Foreign Ministry.
As far back as I can remember, this sort of public Japanese rebuke of a sitting U.S. administration has never happened even once since Japan lost World War II.
The attack in Oman came as Abe was in Iran trying to get Iranian agreement for a new financial system, Japanese military intelligence sources say. The Iranians were supportive, but …
First, I wish to say thank you for your courage and dedication to getting truth out to the world.
In this quote from one of your weekly reports, a major question comes to mind:
“According to senior Pentagon and Asian Secret Society sources, a decision to establish a de facto World government is also being negotiated at the highest levels. This would not be the Khazarian plan for a totalitarian New World Order controlled by Khazarian gangsters. Instead, it would involve democratically revamping the existing international architecture so that real-world peace and prosperity would be possible for the first time in human history.”
My question comes from what seems to be a contradiction, and also from the stated goal of “democratically revamping the existing international architecture.”
1. The contradiction is suggested by the idea that anything negotiated “at the highest levels” to establish a de facto World government cannot possibly be democratic. Who makes up the “highest levels” that would be even partially inclined to choose a democratic process that gives power to the masses? And, any World government created by people who have risen to the highest levels in the current world driven by competitive beliefs and win/lose psychology can only be a continuation of the up/down mentality that creates and sustains “highest levels” that by definition cannot relinquish their power and design themselves out of their power positions.
BF: That is a good point. The thing is, though, I have to deal with the real world and the existing power structures, because pragmatically it appears to be the only way to make things happen. However, the analysis by the Swiss group showed that the top of the power structure consists of 700 people, and that means we outnumber them by 10 million to one. Pressure from the bottom has forced these people to the negotiating table. Many of the worst top power holders have also now been eliminated, so the remainder now “see the light.”
2. “Democratically revamping the existing international architecture” presents a daunting challenge: how to democratically do anything of such magnitude? The “demos”—the people—are to be allowed/trained to vote on all elements of the new architecture? Where on earth is there one working example of democracy? There is none, and yet you envision a global democracy that can decide/vote on what institutions they want to replace an architecture they do not understand with new institutions that are strange to them and beyond the comprehension of a majority of humanity?
BF: What we are witnessing is real-time, live democracy in the form of the Internet. The battle is to keep that forum open and free. Ultimately, I support the idea of a meritocracy. This would be something like a Eurovision song contest where anybody can try to get to the top and everybody can see who got there and why.
Personally, I admire your idealism. In this case, however, I long to read your down-to-earth, nuts-and-bolts recommendations on how the above dream can be accomplished.
My view is that only a grassroots movement that is the opposite of anything the “highest levels” can possibly conceive or implement to a humanity exhausted by such elitist “solutions” can bring about real change. I hope your writing and interviews begin to reveal you are willing to talk to the man in the street and the mother in the kitchen so they understand what they can do with their neighbors and their community to create their own new world.
Looking to any more “solutions” to be handed down to them by the powerful just continues their sheep mindset and hastens the day when their only course is open revolt.
BF: Believe me, I started this process by talking to “the masses,” and I came to the conclusion the masses are good at expressing discontent when they can feel things are wrong. However, when it comes to solutions, it is easier to criticize someone for spilling a glass of milk than it is to put the milk back in the glass. Hopefully, meritocracy will allow for the selection of widely accepted and respected people who have solutions.