Category: Letters to the Editor

Fact-checking about Khomeini

Your post said:

“However, did you know that Ayatollah Khomeini, the leader of the Iranian revolution, was actually of British-Indian heritage and the son of a British Petroleum employee?  The Rothschild-owned BP was then known as Anglo-Iranian Oil.”

A basic fact check will tell you that Khomeini’s father died in 1903.  And he wasn’t British.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British%E2%80%93Ruhollah_Khomeini_conspiracy_theory

Also, Anglo-Iranian Oil wasn’t founded until 1908.

Apart from the factual inaccuracies, I enjoy your fantasy fiction.

Cheers,
—S


Hello,

We are dealing with an Internet that is increasingly full of disinformation.  Maybe the Wikipedia version of history you cite is right, maybe not.  If I had more resources available, I could send somebody to check the paper birth records.  For now, I will just post your comment and let readers decide for themselves.

In any case, apart from the link I posted as evidence for the claim about Khomeini, my sources in the Iranian royal family have long claimed Khomeini was a Rothschild agent sent to overthrow them.

—BF

Question about China

Hi Benjamin,

I was wondering about your opinion concerning the Globalist threat that China might present to the world.

I had always understood that the Rothschild “game plan” was to collapse the American Empire (just like they did with the British Empire after WWII) and then have China become the next dominant empire in the world.  Part of their “order out of chaos” motto.

I notice China is spreading their economic influence throughout both the Pacific and the Caribbean Islands, as well as in South America and Mexico.  They are also establishing economic projects throughout Africa and the Middle East, and of course making Russia their ally rather than their enemy.

While real economic development in the world is welcome (rather than destruction through wars), I am concerned about Xi Jinping declaring himself “President for Life,” as well as the new “Social Credit System” with advanced surveillance technology being implemented throughout China.

My concern is that Xi and the CCP will be tempted to consolidate their economic power throughout the world, especially with the upgrades in their military technology.  Will other countries be able to stop them from ambitions of an expansive Chinese Empire?

I’m one-quarter Chinese and I know that China has long held a belief that they are overdue for a prominent position of recognition in this world.  They have a chip on their shoulder for past indignities suffered at the hands of the Western nations.

What do you think is the risk here?  Appreciate your opinion.

—MB


Hi M,

China, like any country, has people with various ideologies and world views.  The hard-core nationalists believe the West has had long enough, and now it is China’s turn to rule the world.  The globalists in China want China to be part of a world government.

The majority of Chinese, however, are probably mostly apolitical as long as their own personal and family lives are okay.

In the end, though, because of the one child policy, China has a rapidly aging and soon to be shrinking population.

If you look at demographics alone, we will soon see India being the next center of growth.  Right now 60% of their population of 1.3 billion is under the age of 30, so they are young.  Next, if you look again at population growth and the number of young people, will be Africa.

If the West does not want to be dominated by other countries, they need to hurry up and get rid of the incompetent and satanic leadership and start raising their birth rate.  Right now women in all Western countries are not having enough children to replace the current generation.  In other words, as things now stand, shrinking and aging populations mean long-term decline for the West.

There’s lots of talk about there being too many people in the world, but that’s just not true.  The problem is incompetent governments.  It should be fairly easy to keep growing the population even as we increase the amount of virgin nature and wildlife.

—BF

The Vatican and the Royal families

Hello Benjamin:

I am a subscriber of your paid newsletter, and I have been wondering how or why you present the Vatican and the Royal families as the “good guys” against the Deep State, as in my opinion all are rotten satanist pedophiles.

I say this referring to this book (here is the table of contents):
https://phibetaiota.net/2017/07/joachim-hagopian-pedophilia-empire/

Each chapter is backed up by a lot of sources.  Read the chapter about the Vatican, Jesuits, CIA, U.S. Army, …

The British Royals had ties with Lord Savile.

The Netherlands Royals have a really bad pedophilia reputation.

Belgium is not better.

So which Royals were you referring to?  Or rather, what would back up the fact that you consider the Vatican to be the good guys?

Freemasons seem to be the tip of the iceberg in this satanist world.

—M


It is a complicated situation.  The Royal families and the Vatican were heavily infiltrated by Satanists, but a major purge has taken place.  A whole slew of Royals, including Queen Beatrix of Bilderberg (the Netherlands), the King of Spain, the King of Belgium, the Emperor of Japan, etc. were forced to abdicate.  Also, the Vatican has purged over 4,000 pedophile priests, including Pope Maledict.

Another way of looking at it was that the elite was divided between an eternal “war on terror” faction that wanted to kill 90% of the population and a “CO2 = Global Warming” faction that just wanted to hit the 90% with a carbon tax.

The White Dragon Society formed an alliance of convenience with the Global Warming faction to stop the planned genocide.  Now that the genocide has been stopped, the WDS is trying to convince the “good” (or less evil) part of the elite to go along with a plan for a massive campaign to end poverty and stop environmental destruction.

—BF

Article regarding the Rothschilds

Dear Mr Fulford:

I would be grateful if you could comment on this article which appeared in the British Jewish Chronicle.

As a Jew and particularly with the rise of anti-semitism, I find it very upsetting and worrying to read anything that could stoke the flames even more.  What if the article below is correct and this family are innocent of all the accusations?

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,
JS


Dear JS,

First of all, the article you sent me was missing the first several words of every sentence.  If you can get me a link or a full copy, I will post it on my home page for the benefit of my readers.

However, please understand that as a journalist, I try always to get my information from primary sources.  If a representative of the Rothschild family would like to do a public interview with me, I’m sure many people will watch it and judge for themselves.  Too often the Rothschild name is used as shorthand for a group of interrelated families who exert enormous control over the privately owned central banks.

Also, years of research have led me to the conclusion there is a subgroup of the Jews who are not actually Jewish, but worship Satan, Ba’al, Molech, etc.  They appear in the Book of Ruth and carry out human sacrifices.  They hide behind the Jews and use them like a matador’s cape to distract people from them.

Also, there is a group that I call the Sabbateans who believe that it is up to the Jews to make the biblical prophecies come true and bring on the Messiah.  This group was behind the creation of Israel.  Members of my Jewish family were among those who believed God would do God’s work and wanted to stay in their European homeland.  They were attacked and forced by Hitler (a member of the Saxe/Gotha/Rothschild/Habsburg family complex) to go to Israel.

If you check the history, you will see that Jews were only allowed to flee to Israel in the face of Nazi persecution.  Canada has recently apologized for closing its borders to Jews fleeing the Nazis.

Anyway, the rabbit hole runs deep, but I would be happy to set the record straight for the Rothschilds.

—BF


Dear Mr Fulford:

Thank you for replying so promptly.

I hope the attached link works as I am not the most technical of people.  If not, you can find the article in the Jewish Chronicle.  I did a search and it is dated December 11, 2017 under Robert Philpot’s name.  It was reprinted on June 21.

https://www.thejc.com/news/news-features/the-rothschilds-the-banks-and-antisemitism-the-truth-and-the-myths-1.450112?highlight=robert+philpot

I do hope that you manage to obtain an interview with a Rothschild family member, especially if all that is written about them is untrue.  I hope that it is, but one does not know what to believe any more.

Should you publish this article, it will be very interesting to read the responses to it.

I wish you well in your work and in your life.  Thank you.

Sincerely,
JS

Speak to the people

Benjamin:

First, I wish to say thank you for your courage and dedication to getting truth out to the world.

In this quote from one of your weekly reports, a major question comes to mind:

“According to senior Pentagon and Asian Secret Society sources, a decision to establish a de facto World government is also being negotiated at the highest levels.  This would not be the Khazarian plan for a totalitarian New World Order controlled by Khazarian gangsters.  Instead, it would involve democratically revamping the existing international architecture so that real-world peace and prosperity would be possible for the first time in human history.”

My question comes from what seems to be a contradiction, and also from the stated goal of “democratically revamping the existing international architecture.”

1.  The contradiction is suggested by the idea that anything negotiated “at the highest levels” to establish a de facto World government cannot possibly be democratic.  Who makes up the “highest levels” that would be even partially inclined to choose a democratic process that gives power to the masses?  And, any World government created by people who have risen to the highest levels in the current world driven by competitive beliefs and win/lose psychology can only be a continuation of the up/down mentality that creates and sustains “highest levels” that by definition cannot relinquish their power and design themselves out of their power positions.

BF:  That is a good point.  The thing is, though, I have to deal with the real world and the existing power structures, because pragmatically it appears to be the only way to make things happen.  However, the analysis by the Swiss group showed that the top of the power structure consists of 700 people, and that means we outnumber them by 10 million to one.  Pressure from the bottom has forced these people to the negotiating table.  Many of the worst top power holders have also now been eliminated, so the remainder now “see the light.”

2.  “Democratically revamping the existing international architecture” presents a daunting challenge:  how to democratically do anything of such magnitude?  The “demos”—the people—are to be allowed/trained to vote on all elements of the new architecture?  Where on earth is there one working example of democracy?  There is none, and yet you envision a global democracy that can decide/vote on what institutions they want to replace an architecture they do not understand with new institutions that are strange to them and beyond the comprehension of a majority of humanity?

BF:  What we are witnessing is real-time, live democracy in the form of the Internet.  The battle is to keep that forum open and free.  Ultimately, I support the idea of a meritocracy.  This would be something like a Eurovision song contest where anybody can try to get to the top and everybody can see who got there and why.

Personally, I admire your idealism.  In this case, however, I long to read your down-to-earth, nuts-and-bolts recommendations on how the above dream can be accomplished.

My view is that only a grassroots movement that is the opposite of anything the “highest levels” can possibly conceive or implement to a humanity exhausted by such elitist “solutions” can bring about real change.  I hope your writing and interviews begin to reveal you are willing to talk to the man in the street and the mother in the kitchen so they understand what they can do with their neighbors and their community to create their own new world.

Looking to any more “solutions” to be handed down to them by the powerful just continues their sheep mindset and hastens the day when their only course is open revolt.

BF:  Believe me, I started this process by talking to “the masses,” and I came to the conclusion the masses are good at expressing discontent when they can feel things are wrong.  However, when it comes to solutions, it is easier to criticize someone for spilling a glass of milk than it is to put the milk back in the glass.  Hopefully, meritocracy will allow for the selection of widely accepted and respected people who have solutions.