Category: Letters to the Editor

Rothschild at WJC Gala on 11.07.18

 

Hello Benjamin:

Someone I know received an invitation to the World Jewish Congress awards dinner on November 7th in New York City.  It’s at The Pierre on 5th Avenue (see attachment).

Rothschild at WJC Gala 11.07.18

Lord Jacob Rothschild will be accepting an award.  Maybe someone you know would like to go?  Share this invitation.  There must be a few people that would like to see him and his family up close.
—Anon.


If the people appearing at this gala wish to honor the Jewish people, they can start by returning the gold they stole from Asia or by financing a future planning agency to carry out a massive plan to fix up this deeply troubled planet of ours.
—BF

Possibility of clones?

Hello Benjamin,

RE:  who’s alive and who’s dead etc., there is another option to consider, and that is clones.

It is very straightforward to create a clone;  all one needs is two cells from the target and one cell from the opposite sex.  The nucleus is removed from one of the target’s cells and replaces the nucleus of the opposite sex.  Now you have male and female cells of the being you would like to create containing identical information.  All that is needed then is an electrical charge and the cells will begin to reproduce.

This is inserted into a cow’s womb.  The growth hormone secreted from the pituitary gland is then used to accelerate the process.  A duplicate can be made in as little as 48 hours, but the quicker, the more errors.  When the fetus begins to develop its own blood supply it is immediately removed from the cow after its blood is drained from it with literal laser precision.  This is where the cattle “mutilations” originate—the womb will always be missing.

The fetus is now grown in a vat of liquid until of suitable age.  A holographic camera will have been used to take an “image” of the target’s memories and this will be imprinted into the clone’s brain.  You now have an identical copy of the target, complete with memories but the mind of an infant.  This is only suitable for use in controlled circumstances.

The most famous error I know of of a public malfunction was President Carter (the first president cloned) claiming at a press conference he had been attacked by a swamp rabbit.

This so disturbed the powers that be that they arranged a photo shoot to prove this had actually been the case, although they also claimed it was a joke.

Another option is holograms.  Are you aware of tweet from Rudy Giuliani coming clean and confessing and warning people that if someone who sounds like him denies this information and claims that holograms are not real, then he has been replaced?  This is why they always malfunction in Hollywood movies, so it remains “fiction.”

I have done my own analysis on Putin.  He has a unique discoloration in his iris that is easily recognizable in his official portrait during his time in the KGB.  That feature can be tracked from then until present.  So it cannot be a double.  It cannot always be a hologram.

It cannot be a clone, because such a being cannot handle itself as well as Putin does in interviews and other public appearances.  I think he is still alive and prospering as Russia’s leader.

For those who think this man is too jolly for the old dour, serious Putin—people change, especially after a life-changing experience such as his near death experience during a car crash.  Or maybe because, according to Russian scientist Valery Uvarov, he was a changed person after a pyramid-shaped UFO hovered over the Kremlin for days (just search for “Pyramid Over Moscow” at YouTube).

Hope this is useful.
—GS


Benjamin Fulford replies:

For years I have been hearing stories about clones, often from credible sources.  For example, a Chinese assassin told me that he once killed his “Jewish handler,” only to have the same person reappear.

However, I still prefer to use Occam’s Razor and go with the explanation that computer graphics or lookalikes fixed up with plastic surgery are the more likely explanation.


Further comments by others:

>The fetus is now grown in a vat of liquid until of suitable age.

I guess they were cooking up an MbS in a vat for the past 33 years?  That’s planning ahead!

>Are you aware of a tweet from Rudy Giuliani coming clean and confessing?

That’s not a tweet, it’s a document.  Tweets are 140 characters. Here is what Giuliani had to say about some of his other tweets:

“I didn’t tweet that.  That’s not my tweet.  I never said that.  That’s somebody pretending to be me.  There are about four of them out there that pretend to be me.”

Are these people really dead?

On 2018/10/19, Robert David Steele wrote:

I have gotten several messages like this:

WARNING:  While RDS reports (being quoted widely) of “received information” that both the King of SA and MBS are dead and represented by impostors, the giver of said information, Benjamin Fulford, is notorious for reporting people dead who are still walking around, as with HRC, G. Soros, and John Kerry, who Fulford has said was represented by an impostor when urging Iran to stay in a nuclear deal that 45 invalidated.  Upon Kerry’s notorious reappearances after being “really dead,” Fulford tried to CYA in saying that after being hidden in Antarctica, he looks “10-20 years younger” and thus “renewed.”

The warning is that you should do an update of either outing Fulford as the source of a dead king and prince (as Fulford’s “imposters” news is public) with some language distancing yourself and your reputation from such wild and publicly incredulous fates of SA rulers.  While it’s not too damaging for the faithful to think of multiple possibilities in light of the blackout of truth in J. Khashoggi’s disappearance, imagine what a hit your brand’s reputation will take when these two are walking and meeting with world leaders and officials.


Benjamin Fulford replies:

First of all, for a long time Khazarian agents have been using a tactic against people like me and my murdered colleague Christopher Story.  It involves informing us that people are dead, only to have them appear after we report it.  For example, Christopher Story and I were both repeatedly told that Henry Kissinger was dead or arrested, only to have him appear at a major public event shortly after we reported on this.

For that reason, when I report that a senior CIA source told me John Kerry was dead, I am reporting what the source says.  I was told John Kerry was dead by such a source and after I was informed of that, he vanished from public view for about a year.  The John Kerry we are recently seeing on TV looks a lot younger than the John Kerry we saw in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.  However, it may well be I was told a lie by the CIA source, since these people specialize in deceit.

It is well known that body doubles are a common tactic used at the highest levels of power since time immemorial.  It is also well known now that the technology exists to make realistic videos of people using computer graphics.

For all the above reasons, it is a tricky business to report people as dead.

In the case of Mohammad bin Salman (MBS), what we know is as follows:  There was a shooting incident reported at his palace in April.  Shortly afterward, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo went to visit him.  The dinner meeting with MBS was delayed and no photograph of the two meeting was issued, even though it is normal protocol for such a picture to be issued or taken by the press.

Since then, MBS vanished from public view for a long time.  Recently a man claimed to be MBS has been appearing, but he definitely looks different.  My best guess is that a body double was created and we had to wait for the plastic surgery to heal before he could be trotted out in public.

Finally, last week a senior Japanese intelligence official told me he personally called MBS’s lawyer, a man always seen with him.  The lawyer told him MBS was shot twice in the head in April and was dead.

Since the death or life of MBS involves the control over trillions of petrodollars, creating the appearance that he is still alive is clearly very important for the petrodollar people.

Time will tell the truth, as it always does.

Warning from Singapore about Negatives of Meritocracy

Dear Ben,
Please reference the following article:
https://mothership.sg/2018/10/meritocracy-privilege-elitism-intolerance-problems/

While it may sound like a good idea to envision the future planning agency on meritocratic principles, the twin issues of privilege and elitism MUST be acknowledged as major stumbling blocks in meritocracy.

Otherwise, it will be a global case of what has been/is happening locally in Singapore.  Yes, the country is prosperous.  Yes, the country is advanced.  But at what cost?  Who here speaks for the homeless?  Who here helps the jobless?  Who here looks after the welfare of late bloomers?  Answer:  No one.

The general attitude here is “you die, your business” in Singlish, or “every man for himself” in English.  THAT is pragmatic meritocracy as practiced in Singapore.

The future planning agency of the WDS MUST look into the negatives of meritocracy, especially from the ground level in Singapore, and come up with game plans to effectively tackle these issues.  It is not sufficient to repeatedly hold the Singapore example up as a shining beacon to the rest of the world while conveniently sidestepping those who have fallen through the cracks;  never mind the “straitjacket society” that Singaporeans are loathe to live in.

Cheers,
—M


Hi M:
Yes, I am fully aware that Singapore is far from perfect in many ways.  We are planning to use the best parts of their system, but also intend to have a safety net based on best practices from around the world;  for example, the Scandinavian countries.
—BF


Hi Ben,
Thank you for the clarification.  Hopefully, a white paper could be published soon on the vision of the future planning agency, together with a public invitation for meaningful collaboration to make it even better.
—M

Urgent Request from Brazil

Hi Ben, how are you?

I don’t want to take too much of your time, so I’ll try to be brief.

In your last report (October 1, 2018), you spoke about Jair Bolsonaro, the right-wing candidate for Brazilian Presidency, as follows:

“Bolsonaro represents the Nazi/Zionist faction that has been looting Brazil’s resources and impoverishing its people, and so obviously they would be very scared of losing power.”

I totally believe you, but then you posted that letter from a Bolsonaro supporter that goes totally against that information and makes him a hero—the new Trump.

I can tell you for sure he is more a Nazi/Zionist than a new Trump.  He gets his support from the Evangelical Church, one of the most corrupt institutions in Brazil.  He supports dictatorship and the use of torture and he is not even ashamed of saying it on TV.  Because he knows his radical comments are not very welcomed to a good part of the population, he’s been skipping the debates with other candidates on TV even before he got stabbed.  Instead of debating, he’s using all his forces through fake news, using Whatsapp and Facebook groups, to blind his followers from reality.  He blames the media for everything, so that people only believe in his words.

It’s a very sad situation, especially when you know that the media was always actually against Dilma and Lula, and that’s why it got to play a huge role over the impeachment of Dilma and putting Lula in jail without concrete proof of anything.  Lula was by far the favorite candidate for presidency in 2018 and that’s why they did it.

On May 28th 2018, you posted another report that supports the fact that Bolsonaro is the bad guy, not Lula:

“Another blow against the Bush/Nazi faction of the cabal may come soon in the form of a military coup in Brazil, Pentagon sources are saying.  Here, a truckers’ strike has paralyzed the economy.  This is expected to be the trigger for a military coup that will restore former presidents Dilma Rousseff and Lula da Silva “from Zionist usurpers who seized control of the central bank in 2016,” the sources say.”

I kindly ask you to urgently communicate with your trustworthy sources to know what is really going on in Brazil and if possible give us a small report before this Sunday, as it is the Election Day.

For your information, your report from October 1st speaking about Bolsonaro was not even published in the Portuguese version.

https://benjaminfulfordtranslations.blogspot.com/search/label/BRAZILIAN

This has never occurred before and I am afraid the Zionists are blocking it.  That’s very serious, because there are a lot of people who get informed from alternative media like yours, and the Bolsonaro team knows it very well.

Thank you for your attention and for your great reports always.

—BM


OK, I will publish your letter and all I can say is that I hope the people of Brazil make a wise choice.
—BF


Much appreciated, although my intention was never to try to convince you of anything, but to push you to give us some information from your sources who know what is really going on.  At least people will get another perspective from my comment and get to make their own conclusions out of this.

It’s important to point out that Lula took millions of people out of poverty threshold, and that probably made the Zionists very mad, as these people would finally be able to have access to education, making them a bit harder to be enslaved and manipulated.

But with the Zionists in control of the mainstream media in Brazil, they were able to trigger the wrath of the middle classes against Lula, painting him and all his party as the bad guys (which many probably are, but not necessarily Lula).  And that’s how we got to the point where people prefer to have a dictatorship in place instead of having Lula’s party back.

—BM